| ||||
Reader Comments
Hi 'James'. Well, I'm sorry you don't agree with my review, although I do make some quite positive remarks about certain features of this album. Perhaps roots/acoustic would have been a better category to put the music under - you have a point there, (although I think it could be argued that some tracks better equally well into the MOR/soft Pop category). But I think I would change it to Roots if i could.
A few of your other points are quite strong - eg, that I have no idea what I'm talking about, probably don't know much about music period, and that I'm unable to handle the 'grace message'.....fairly personal remarks, 'james'..........
I think ultimately we just have to agree to disagree. You think this album pushes the boundaries and is refreshingly different - I return to my comment that DB is at his best on the more stripped-down numbers, where he's more vulnerable and where a greater sense of intimacy comes over.......


I personally think the person who wrote this review has no idea what he is talking about. He probably doesn't have much knowledge of music period! I have the album I think it's actually refreshing for someone to do something that is called "different" in this worship scene, just because it doesn't sound like the others (who I won't name) doesn't mean it's not good. Yes some of the songs are infectious--why is this fact annoying? Maybe it's a case that the grace message is too much to handle?? I think Dave Bilbrough continues to push the boundaries. If the reviewer had properly listened to the album then he would realise that its style is rootsy and not soft pop which you have put in the style catergory (your first mistake my friend). This album is authentic which is something I have not heard in the worship scene for a very long time.